This is when I discovered duplicati 2 and although it was still in beta, it looked very promising.
#2017 arq backup review software
He listened patiently to my problems and although he insisted that he has lots and lots of customers where the software works fine, I did manage to convince him to look at the issues I had (this is how it should be but not all developers/companies do that) and we managed to track down a couple of bugs but it seemed a neverending story and so I eventually decided to scrap syncovery and start looking anew, even though this entailed that I would probably have to pro-long my Crashplan subscription another year. So while my experience with the software was not so good in the end, I can only say good things about the support by the developer. Syncovery was very promising but I kept bumping into bugs and errors and I spend a hell of a lot of time helping the developer debug these problems and he actually ended up compensating me for some of that work. (Well actually you can change the source folder and the original stuff in the backup will remain but will no longer be backed up.) With SyncbackPro, the restore process seemed rather complicated and once a folder is selected as the source, you cannot add other folders to that backup job. Goodsync had crap customer service (reasonably fast response, but useless and not answering my question) and it was designed more for syncing than for backing up (although backing up is possible). Goodsync, Cloudberry and SyncBackPro were out pretty quickly :Ĭloudberry cannot handle backups larger than 1TB unless you buy the enterprise version for 300 USD. I spend a lot of time testing various solutions, including Arq, Goodsync, Cloudberry, SyncBackPro and Syncovery. Apparently it was in line with their Terms of Service, but deleting backups is not a goof thing to do for a backup company). I focused on software solutions that would allow me to back up to whichever storage I want so that I would be in better control of my data (Crashplan at some point deleted an entire backup of mine because the computer it was associated with hadn’t backed up anything for more than six months. But Crashplan turned out to be a memory hog (especially if you have a multi-terrabyte harddrive) and it was clear that I want a better solution so I started looking for an alternative in 2016, one year before the subscription was supposed to end. At the time, I bought into their four year family plan (=multiple computers) for 429.99 USD. Also I don't have to worry that Arq is going to accidentally access or delete any storage objects that don't belong to it.I have been using Crashplan as my backup tool since February 2015.
#2017 arq backup review password
I never have to type my password into Arq and if someone manages to steal my key they only have access to that one object. That way I could make a key that only has permission to access a single pre-created storage object and give that key to Arq. Google Cloud Storage has ways to make keys for apps which seems like a more correct way to set up something like Arq. It doesn't seem like good practice to be giving some 3rd party app control of my google account. It then asks for permission to control all storage in my account When I try to set this up it asks for my account name/password I'd like to use Arq to backup my computer with Google Cloud Storage. Is it possible to setup Arq backup to use Google Cloud Storage without having to give it your login credentials
0 kommentar(er)
